Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

siva: return error in repositoy commit if not transactional #17

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2019

Conversation

mcarmonaa
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Manuel Carmona manu.carmona90@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Manuel Carmona <manu.carmona90@gmail.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #17 into siva will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             siva      #17      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.75%   68.62%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         797      800       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          548      549       +1     
- Misses        180      181       +1     
- Partials       69       70       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
siva/location.go 70.71% <100%> (-1.43%) ⬇️
siva/repository.go 88.67% <100%> (+0.67%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c0583f3...65d9d4c. Read the comment docs.

@jfontan jfontan merged commit 581436f into jfontan:siva Feb 25, 2019
@mcarmonaa mcarmonaa deleted the siva-commit-err branch February 25, 2019 10:17
jfontan added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2019
…pport

siva: add option to use bucket levels for the siva files locations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants